🇬🇧
Module 8 · 33 chapitres

Advanced English Knowledge and Skills

A complete knowledge unit for the English specialization test (qualifying secondary cycle), built on the official November 2025 test specifications: Reading Comprehension (20%), Language (60%: grammar, communicative functions, language and cultural awareness, lexis) and Writing (20%). 31 chapters with explicit objectives, worked examples and examination traps, plus 58 practice items in three graded tests.

33 chapitres 58 questions ~14.0 heures

Objectifs du module

  • Scan for explicit information and compare details accurately.
  • Distinguish fact, opinion, prediction and degree of certainty.
  • Resolve anaphoric and cataphoric reference.
  • Infer vocabulary through grammatical, lexical and contextual cues.
  • Recognize cohesion and organizational patterns.
  • Identify viewpoint, tone, purpose, attitude, mood and intention.
  • Paraphrase and summarize faithfully.
  • Apply the complete targeted grammar system.
  • Select communicative functions appropriate to context and politeness.
  • Analyze word classes, word formation, phrases, clauses and sentence functions.
  • Recognize discourse modes and British/American conventions without stereotyping.
  • Interpret lexical meaning, collocations, phrasal verbs and idioms.
  • Evaluate paragraph structure, genres and organizational patterns.
  • Judge unity, cohesion, coherence and mechanics.
  • Manage a weighted four-hour objective test strategically.
Orientation

The official specification divides the English specialization test into Reading Comprehension, Language and Writing. The Language component is largest, but the components interact: grammar and lexis support reading, while reading provides models for writing.

Blueprint used as a study allocation, not a prediction of exact item counts.
Main componentSub-componentOfficial weightPreparation priority
Reading ComprehensionNarrative, descriptive, argumentative, expository and other texts20%Retrieval, inference, structure and reformulation
LanguageGrammar25%Accuracy and form–meaning relations
LanguageCommunicative functions5%Contextually appropriate speech acts
LanguageLanguage and cultural awareness15%Metalanguage, structure, register and variation
LanguageLexis15%Meaning relations and lexical patterning
WritingParagraphs, genres, organization, cohesion and mechanics20%Recognizing and diagnosing effective prose
Exam lens. The official document identifies objective multiple-choice questions. Therefore, learn to select, diagnose, compare and justify—not merely to recite definitions.
Source basis. Scope and weighting come from the official Moroccan specification. Explanations are synthesized from the Council of Europe CEFR Companion Volume, British Council LearnEnglish, Cambridge English Grammar Today and Purdue OWL.

How to work with this unit

Understand

Learn the form–meaning relationship, not just the label.

Discriminate

Compare near-correct alternatives and identify the decisive feature.

Retrieve

Answer without notes and explain why distractors fail.

Part I — Reading Comprehension (20%)

Chapter objectives

  • Differentiate narrative, descriptive, argumentative and expository texts.
  • Predict likely structures and language features before close reading.
  • Use a three-pass procedure under examination conditions.

A genre is not merely a label. It creates expectations about purpose, organization, evidence and language. A text may combine genres, but one communicative purpose is usually dominant.

GenrePrimary purposeTypical organizationFrequent signals
NarrativeRelate events and their significanceOrientation → complication → development → resolution/reflectionPast tenses, temporal markers, viewpoint, dialogue and action verbs
DescriptiveCreate a precise impressionSpatial order, general-to-specific or dominant impressionAdjectives, sensory language, location expressions and comparison
ArgumentativeDefend a claim and influence judgmentPosition → reasons/evidence → counterargument → response → conclusionEvaluation, modals, concession, causal links and evidence verbs
ExpositoryExplain, classify or informDefinition, classification, sequence, cause–effect, comparison or problem–solutionTechnical terms, examples, definitions and logical connectors

The three-pass procedure

  1. Preview: inspect title, source, opening and paragraph beginnings. Form a provisional hypothesis.
  2. Question-led reading: identify whether the item requires a detail, relation, attitude, reference or whole-text judgment.
  3. Verification: return to the relevant lines and test every option. Choose what is fully supported, not merely plausible.
Common trap. Background knowledge can make a distractor sound true. “True in the world” is not the same as “supported by this text.”
Quick check

“The report defines microlearning, divides it into three formats and gives an example of each.” The organization is definition followed by classification and exemplification.

Chapter objectives

  • Locate specific information without rereading the entire text.
  • Compare entities using the same criterion.
  • Distinguish verifiable claims from evaluations, predictions and recommendations.

Scanning

Convert the question into a search key: a date, name, percentage, repeated term, synonym or category. Read a small window around the match because the answer may be expressed indirectly.

Question: Why was the pilot extended? Search keys: pilot, extended, continued, renewed, second phase. Locate the causal clause, not merely the programme name.

Comparison

Compare like with like: cost with cost, purpose with purpose, method with method. A distractor may combine one true statement about A with an unrelated truth about B.

CriterionProgramme AProgramme BRelationship
DeliveryWeekly seminarSelf-paced modulesDifference
AssessmentPortfolioPortfolioSimilarity
Target groupNew teachersExperienced mentorsDifference

Fact versus opinion

StatementClassificationReason
The survey included 840 participants.FactNumerically verifiable.
The redesigned course is far more engaging.OpinionEvaluative comparison.
The policy will probably reduce absence.Prediction/opinionFuture outcome marked as probability.
The committee recommends a two-year trial.Reportable fact about a recommendationIts existence can be verified; its wisdom remains evaluative.
Elimination technique. Absolute words such as always, never, completely are wrong when the text uses often, may, partly or one factor.

Chapter objectives

  • Resolve anaphora and cataphora through agreement, meaning and discourse focus.
  • Infer unfamiliar vocabulary from morphology, syntax and context.
  • Recognize reference, substitution, ellipsis, conjunction and lexical cohesion.

Reference

Anaphora points backward: “The teachers revised the plan. They simplified it.” Cataphora points forward: “When she entered, Dr Patel noticed the silence.” Use agreement, semantic compatibility, grammatical role and discourse prominence.

“The principal discussed the proposal with the teachers after they requested a revision.” The likely referent is the teachers: plural agreement and plausible agency support it.

Vocabulary inference

CueQuestionIllustration
MorphologyWhat do prefix, root and suffix suggest?misinterpretation = wrong understanding.
SyntaxWhat part of speech fits?“a remarkably lucid explanation” → adjective.
Definition/appositionDoes the text restate it?“formative assessment, ongoing feedback used to improve learning.”
ContrastIs it opposed to a known idea?“not rigid but adaptable” → flexible.
ExampleDo examples reveal the category?“renewable sources such as solar and wind.”
Cause/resultWhat effect does it produce?“The instructions were ambiguous, so groups interpreted them differently.”

Cohesive patterns

ResourceFunctionExample
ReferencePoints to people or ideasthis finding, they, the former
SubstitutionReplaces repeated material“the blue folder, not the red one
EllipsisOmits recoverable material“Some agreed; others did not [agree].”
ConjunctionSignals a logical relationshiphowever, therefore, meanwhile
Lexical cohesionLinks through semantic relationsteacher → instructor → educator

Cohesion is the surface network of links; coherence is the meaningful whole. Connectors cannot repair contradictory or badly ordered ideas.

Chapter objectives

  • Identify the dominant relation among ideas.
  • Distinguish topic from structure.
  • Use signal words as evidence without relying on them mechanically.
PatternCentral questionSignalsOutline
DefinitionWhat is it?refers to, meansTerm → category → features → example
ClassificationWhat types exist?types, categories, divided intoPrinciple → categories → examples
SequenceIn what order?first, next, finallyStage 1 → Stage 2 → Stage 3
Cause–effectWhy, and with what result?because, leads to, consequentlyCause → mechanism → effect
Comparison–contrastHow alike or different?similarly, whereas, unlikeBlock or point-by-point
Problem–solutionWhat is wrong and what can be done?challenge, remedy, proposalProblem → criteria → solution → evaluation
ArgumentWhat position is defended?should, evidence, althoughClaim → support → counterclaim → rebuttal
Do not confuse topic and structure. “School transport” is a topic. “Comparison of two transport systems by cost and reliability” is an organization.
“Large classes create three difficulties: reduced feedback, longer correction time and limited participation. The first… The second… The third…” Dominant pattern: classification/listing of effects.

Chapter objectives

  • Separate perspective from subject matter.
  • Infer tone from clusters of lexical, syntactic and rhetorical evidence.
  • Distinguish attitude, mood and intention.
  • Predict continuation from unresolved discourse functions.

Point of view

Literary point of view asks who perceives and narrates: first person, third-person limited or omniscient. In articles and emails, viewpoint also concerns how an issue is framed.

EvidenceInference
“I could not see what the others were planning.”First-person limited knowledge.
Private thoughts of several characters are revealed.Third-person omniscient.
An article foregrounds taxpayer cost but omits learner outcomes.Economic or fiscal framing.

Tone and attitude

Approving

constructive, promising, carefully designed

Critical

short-sighted, flawed, troubling

Cautious

may, appears, preliminary, to some extent

Ironic

Literal praise conflicts with context: “A brilliant plan—if the aim was confusion.”

Purpose, attitude, mood and intention

  • Purpose: the response sought—inform, explain, persuade, complain, request, warn or entertain.
  • Attitude: the writer’s evaluation.
  • Mood: the emotional atmosphere—tense, hopeful, bleak.
  • Intention: what a speaker attempts through an utterance.
“I would appreciate a written explanation and confirmation that the charge has been removed.” Purpose: complaint plus request for corrective action.

Predicting continuation

A paragraph ending with a problem often moves to causes or solutions. A concession usually prepares a limitation. A narrative complication predicts attempted resolution.

Chapter objectives

  • Preserve meaning while changing wording and structure.
  • Reject distortion, copying and unsupported additions.
  • Select main ideas and omit minor detail.

A paraphrase remains approximately as specific as the source but changes linguistic form. Preserve participants, time, modality, scope and degree.

Source/candidateEvaluation
Source: “Limited feedback may reduce novice teachers’ confidence.”Key constraints: limited, may, reduce, novice.
“Beginning teachers can become less confident when feedback is insufficient.”Faithful paraphrase.
“A lack of feedback always destroys teachers’ confidence.”Distorted: may became always; reduce became destroy.
“Limited feedback may lower novice teachers’ confidence.”Too close for an extended paraphrase.

Paraphrase operations

  • Change clause structure: active/passive, verbal/nominal, coordination/subordination.
  • Change word class: the committee decidedthe committee’s decision.
  • Use accurate synonyms and change order.
  • Preserve technical terms when substitution reduces precision.
  • Keep hedges: might is not will; some is not all.

Summary hierarchy

Retain the controlling idea, major support and essential conclusion. Remove examples, repetition and decorative detail unless central.

Effective summary: “The report argues that mentoring can improve teacher retention, but only when institutions provide trained mentors, protected time and defined roles.”
Summary traps. Reject options that add judgment, focus on one example, reverse the position or omit a decisive qualification.
Part II — Language (60%)

Chapter objectives

  • Choose articles through definiteness, countability and reference.
  • Distinguish determiners from quantifiers.
  • Apply quantity expressions accurately.
FormCore meaningExample
a/anOne non-specific singular count noun; first mention; classification“She proposed a solution.”
theIdentifiable/unique reference; shared knowledge; second mention“I read a report. The report was detailed.”
Zero articleGeneral plural/non-count referenceFeedback supports learning.”

Simplified order: predeterminer + central determiner + number/order + adjective + noun: all those first three demanding tasks. Two central determiners normally cannot co-occur: the my bookmy book.

Count pluralNon-countBothMeaning
many, few, a few, fewermuch, little, a little, lesssome, any, enough, a lot offew/little ≈ almost none; a few/a little = some
each, every + singularalleach highlights individuals; every covers all members
Trap. Information, advice, research, equipment, furniture are normally non-count. Use a piece of advice.

Chapter objectives

  • Interpret tense and aspect.
  • Maintain logical tense relationships.
  • Select gerund or infinitive complements by pattern and meaning.
FormTypical useExample
Present simpleStates, routines, truths, schedules“The course begins on Monday.”
Present continuousTemporary activity, arrangement, change“The team is revising the rubric.”
Past simpleCompleted event in finished past time“They published it in 2024.”
Past continuousBackground/in-progress past activity“While they were working, the system failed.”
Present perfectPast connected to present; unfinished period“Researchers have identified three patterns.”
Past perfectEarlier past relative to a later past point“The meeting began after everyone had arrived.”
Future perfectCompletion before a future point“By June, they will have completed three cycles.”

Some stative verbs resist progressive aspect: know, believe, belong. Meaning can change: “I think it is fair” (opinion) versus “I am thinking about it” (activity).

PatternExamplesIllustration
verb + -ingavoid, consider, enjoy, suggest“They suggested revising the schedule.”
verb + to-infinitiveagree, decide, hope, refuse“They agreed to revise it.”
verb + object + to-infinitiveadvise, allow, encourage, tell“The mentor encouraged her to apply.”
preposition + -ingbefore, without, interested in“Before submitting, check the file.”
  • remember to do = remember a required action; remember doing = recall.
  • stop to do = pause in order to; stop doing = discontinue.
  • try to do = attempt; try doing = experiment.

Chapter objectives

  • Express ability, permission, obligation, advice, possibility and deduction.
  • Interpret force and politeness.
  • Form modal perfects.
FunctionFormsKey contrast
Abilitycan, could, be able tocould general past ability; managed to one successful event
Permissioncan, may, couldTentativeness and formality vary by context
Obligationmust, have to, need tomustn’t = prohibition; don’t have to = no necessity
Adviceshould, ought to, had betterhad better often implies consequences
Possibilitymay, might, couldDegree depends on context
Deductionmust, can’t, may/might“She must be busy” is inference, not obligation

Modal perfect pattern: modal + have + past participle.

  • must have forgotten: strong past deduction.
  • might have missed: possible past event.
  • should have checked: criticism/regret.
  • needn’t have printed: it happened but was unnecessary.
  • could have applied: unrealized possibility.
Critical contrast. “You mustn’t share it” prohibits. “You don’t have to share it” removes obligation.

Chapter objectives

  • Control countability, number and possession.
  • Maintain clear reference and agreement.
  • Distinguish major pronoun classes.
  • Count: a criterion/two criteria; an analysis/several analyses.
  • Non-count: evidence, feedback, progress, knowledge.
  • Collective: team, committee, staff; agreement may reflect unit or members and varies by variety.
  • Compound: the head is usually final: two classroom observation reports.
When the supervisor spoke to the teacher, she was worried.
The teacher looked worried when the supervisor spoke to her. The revision removes ambiguous reference.

Use a reflexive when subject and object are the same: “She assessed herself.” Use it emphatically: “The director herself answered.” Do not use it as a formal substitute for me: contact Ahmed or myselfcontact Ahmed or me.

Chapter objectives

  • Choose prepositions of time, place, movement and abstract relation.
  • Learn dependent prepositions as lexical patterns.
  • Distinguish prepositions from particles.
DomainContrastExamples
Timeat point; on day/date; in periodat 9; on Tuesday; in August
Placeat point/institution; on surface; in enclosureat school; on the desk; in the room
Movementto, into, onto, through, across“walked into the office and across the room”
Durationfor length; since starting pointfor two years; since 2024

Learn dependent patterns as units: responsible for, interested in, capable of, comply with, depend on, contribute to, distinguish between, object to. A preposition takes a noun phrase or gerund: “object to changing the procedure.”

Particle test. “Look up the word” permits “look the word up”; “look after the child” is inseparable in this meaning.

Chapter objectives

  • Coordinate equal units.
  • Subordinate clauses for logical relations.
  • Use correlative structures in parallel form.
TypeFormsExample
Coordinatingand, but, or, nor, for, so, yet“Simple, yet powerful.”
Subordinatingbecause, although, if, unless, while“Although it is simple, it needs practice.”
Correlativeboth…and; either…or; not only…but also“Both accuracy and fluency.”
Conjunctive adverbhowever, therefore, moreover“The sample was small; therefore, the conclusion was cautious.”

Maintain parallelism: “both identifying errors and explaining corrections”, not “both identifying errors and an explanation of corrections.”

  • Independent clause + comma + coordinating conjunction + independent clause.
  • Independent clause + semicolon + conjunctive adverb + comma + independent clause.
  • Introductory dependent clause + comma + independent clause.

Chapter objectives

  • Distinguish phrases, finite clauses and non-finite clauses.
  • Identify noun, relative and adverbial clauses.
  • Diagnose fragments and run-ons.
  • A phrase has a head but no full subject–finite verb relation: the carefully revised policy.
  • A finite clause contains tense/modality: the committee revised the policy.
  • A non-finite clause uses infinitive/participle: to improve access; having reviewed the data.
ClauseFunctionExample
Noun clauseSubject, object or complementWhat the team discovered changed the plan.”
Relative/adjective clauseModifies a noun“The plan that the team proposed.”
Adverbial clauseTime, reason, condition, concession, etc.“They revised it because the evidence changed.”

Simple: one independent clause. Compound: two or more independent clauses. Complex: independent + dependent. Compound-complex: at least two independent + dependent.

Length is irrelevant. “After the long meeting in the district office” is a phrase and fragment. “She agreed” is a complete simple sentence.

Restrictive relative clauses identify the noun and usually have no commas. Non-restrictive clauses add supplementary information and use commas; standard usage does not use that in them.

Chapter objectives

  • Form passive constructions across tenses and modals.
  • Choose passive according to focus.
  • Recognize reporting and causative patterns.

Pattern: subject + BE in the required form + past participle (+ by-agent).

ActivePassiveFocus
The panel evaluates applications.Applications are evaluated by the panel.Process/applications
They have revised the criteria.The criteria have been revised.Result; agent unimportant
Schools must submit the form.The form must be submitted by schools.Required item
  • Unknown agent: “The window was broken.”
  • Obvious/irrelevant agent: “Results will be announced.”
  • Topical process: “Each application is scored twice.”
  • Impersonal reporting: “It is believed that…” / “The reform is believed to…”

Have/get something done means arrange for someone else to act: “The school had the network repaired.” Get + participle is often less formal and event-focused.

State or passive? “The door is closed” may describe a state. Context and the possible by-agent help.

Chapter objectives

  • Report statements, questions, commands and requests.
  • Apply backshift where context requires.
  • Choose reporting-verb patterns.

Backshift is common after a past reporting verb: present → past; present perfect/past → past perfect; will → would; can → could. It may be unnecessary for still-valid facts or immediate reporting.

Direct: “The course is full.” Reported: “She said that the course was full.” Still-valid notice: “The notice says it is full.”
  • Reported questions use statement order: “He asked where the meeting was.”
  • Yes/no questions use if/whether.
  • Commands/requests: tell/ask/order/warn + object + (not) to-infinitive.
PatternVerbsExample
verb + that-clauseadmit, claim, explain, insist“She explained that the deadline had changed.”
verb + to-infinitiveagree, offer, promise, refuse“He offered to help.”
verb + object + to-infinitiveadvise, remind, tell, warn“They reminded us to sign.”
verb + -ingadmit, deny, recommend, suggest“She denied changing it.”
verb + preposition + -ingapologize for, insist on, object to“He apologized for arriving late.”

Chapter objectives

  • Distinguish real, hypothetical and counterfactual conditions.
  • Form mixed conditionals by time relationship.
  • Use wish and if only accurately.
TypeFormMeaningExample
Zeroif + present, presentGeneral relationIf water reaches 100°C at sea level, it boils.
Firstif + present, will/modal + baseReal future possibilityIf the file arrives, we will review it.
Secondif + past, would + baseHypothetical present/futureIf I were responsible, I would revise it.
Thirdif + past perfect, would have + participleCounterfactual pastIf they had tested it, they would have found the error.
MixedPast condition + present result, or reverseTimes differIf she had accepted, she would be abroad now.

Alternatives: unless = if not; provided that, as long as; inversion: “Had they known, they would have acted.” In case expresses precaution, not the same condition as if.

  • wish + past: unsatisfactory present.
  • wish + past perfect: past regret.
  • wish + would: desired change, often irritation.
  • wish + could: desired ability/possibility.
Meaning first. Identify time of condition, time of result and whether the speaker treats it as open, hypothetical or impossible.

Chapter objectives

  • Recognize speech acts in context.
  • Select expressions appropriate to relationship and setting.
  • Distinguish grammatical form from pragmatic function.
FunctionNeutralTentative/formal
AgreeingI agree.That is persuasive, particularly because…
Partial agreementThat is partly true, but…I accept the principle; however, its application may be problematic.
ComplainingThe order arrived late.I am writing to express concern about the delayed delivery.
CertaintyI am certain that…The available evidence strongly indicates that…
ApologizingI am sorry for the delay.Please accept my apologies for the inconvenience.
RequestingPlease send the file.Could you please send the revised file by Thursday?
SuggestingLet’s revise it.It may be worth considering a revision.
RefusingI cannot attend.I am afraid I will not be able to attend.

Form and function may differ. “Can you open the window?” is grammatically a question about ability but pragmatically a request. “You might want to check the total” is tactful advice or warning.

Context variables. Consider power, distance, urgency, formality and burden. In an emergency, a direct command may be more appropriate than an elaborate polite request.

Chapter objectives

  • Classify words by syntactic behavior.
  • Identify derivation, inflection, compounding and conversion.
  • Use affixes to infer meaning and class.
ClassTypical roleDiagnostic evidence
NounHead of noun phraseMay pluralize, take a determiner or possessive.
VerbHead of verb phraseMay show tense and combine with auxiliaries.
AdjectiveModifier or complementMay precede noun or follow linking verb.
AdverbModifier of verb/adjective/adverb/clauseFlexible position; many, not all, end in -ly.
DeterminerMarks noun-phrase referencethe, this, my, some, each.
PrepositionHeads prepositional phraseTakes noun phrase or gerund complement.
  • Derivation: educate → education → educational.
  • Inflection: teach → teaches/taught/teaching.
  • Compounding: classroom, feedback cycle, data-driven.
  • Conversion: email noun → verb without an affix.
  • Clipping/blending/acronymy: lab, webinar, UNESCO.
AffixMeaning/classExample
un-, in-/im-, dis-negative/oppositeunclear, impractical, disagree
re-, mis-, over-, under-again, wrongly, excessive, insufficientreassess, misread, overgeneralize
-tion, -ment, -itynoun-formingevaluation, development, validity
-ive, -al, -ous, -ableadjective-formingformative, cultural, rigorous

Chapter objectives

  • Identify heads, modifiers and complements.
  • Distinguish form from function.
  • Analyze subject, verb, object, complement and adjunct.

In “the extremely useful diagnostic report,” report is the noun head; the is determiner; extremely useful is an adjective phrase modifier.

ExpressionFormFunction
After the meeting, we left.Prepositional phraseAdjunct of time
The aim is to improve access.Infinitival clauseSubject complement
We discussed what the survey revealed.Finite noun clauseDirect object
The candidates seemed confident.Adjective phraseSubject complement

Common clause patterns: SV, SVC, SVO, SVOO, SVOC.

  • SV: Attendance increased.
  • SVC: The result seems reliable.
  • SVO: The panel reviewed the evidence.
  • SVOO: The mentor gave the trainee feedback.
  • SVOC: The panel considered the evidence insufficient.
Complement versus adjunct. “She put the file on the desk” requires a location complement in this use of put. “She read the file after lunch” uses an optional time adjunct.

Chapter objectives

  • Identify discourse mode.
  • Recognize mitigation and intensification.
  • Evaluate register and interpersonal effect.
ModePurposeTypical realizations
AssertionPresent a proposition as trueDeclaratives, evidential verbs, certainty markers
DenialReject truth or responsibilitynot, deny, no evidence, did not
ObjectionChallenge a proposal or claimI object to…, however…, that overlooks…
AccusationAttribute wrongdoingYou failed to…, they deliberately…
PolitenessManage distance and impositionIndirectness, hedges, apologies, gratitude, conditionals

Mitigation: perhaps, somewhat, may, appears, I am afraid, could you. Intensification: clearly, absolutely, entirely, must, deeply.

Accusation: “You ignored the procedure.”
Mitigated objection: “The procedure does not appear to have been followed in this instance.” The second depersonalizes criticism while retaining the problem.

Chapter objectives

  • Recognize common systematic differences without ranking varieties.
  • Interpret vocabulary and conventions contextually.
  • Avoid stereotypes and overgeneralization.
British tendencyAmerican tendencyExamples
-our-orcolour/color; behaviour/behavior
-re-ercentre/center; metre/meter
-ise/-ize both possible-ize commonorganise/organize
Often doubles final lOften single ltravelling/traveling
BritishAmericanReferent
flatapartmentResidence in a larger building
liftelevatorVertical transport
holidayvacationPeriod away from work/school
queuelinePeople waiting
head teacherprincipalSchool leader; systems vary
  • British usage more readily uses plural agreement with collective nouns when emphasizing members; American usage more often uses singular.
  • Have got is especially common in British informal possession.
  • Recent-event present-perfect versus past-simple preferences can differ.
Avoid false binaries. Many forms coexist and global English users mix conventions. Formal writing should be internally consistent.

Chapter objectives

  • Interpret meaning in context.
  • Distinguish near-synonyms by connotation, register and collocation.
  • Recognize major semantic relations.
RelationDefinitionExample
SynonymySimilarity, rarely complete identitybegin/start
AntonymyOppositiongradable hot/cold; converse buy/sell
HyponymyKind-of relationoak is a kind of tree
MeronymyPart–wholechapter is part of a book
PolysemyRelated senseshead of a person/department/table
HomonymySame form, unrelated meaningsriver bank/financial bank

Near-synonyms differ in denotation, connotation, register, grammar and collocation. Slim and skinny both imply thinness, but often have different evaluations. Ask and inquire/enquire differ in formality.

Chapter objectives

  • Recognize conventional word partnerships.
  • Distinguish grammatical possibility from idiomatic choice.
  • Record vocabulary in chunks.
PatternExamples
Adjective + nounstrong evidence, heavy workload, close attention
Verb + noundraw a conclusion, meet a deadline, conduct research
Noun + nounassessment criteria, learning outcome, policy framework
Adverb + adjectivehighly effective, deeply concerned
Verb + adverbstrongly recommend, vary considerably
Prepositional patternincrease in, reason for, access to
make a decision · do research · take responsibility · pose a question
do a decision · make research · do responsibility · put a question
Test method. Read beyond the blank. The answer may depend on the following noun or preposition: capable of doing, ability to do, prevent someone from doing.

Chapter objectives

  • Distinguish phrasal, prepositional and phrasal-prepositional verbs.
  • Apply separability rules.
  • Infer literal and idiomatic meanings.
TypeStructureExampleObject position
Phrasalverb + particleturn down an offerOften separable; pronoun: turn it down
Prepositionalverb + prepositionrely on evidenceNot separable: rely on it
Phrasal-prepositionalverb + particle + prepositionput up with noiseObject follows full unit
  • carry out = perform.
  • point out = draw attention to.
  • look into = investigate.
  • come up with = produce an idea.
  • rule out = eliminate as a possibility.
  • follow up on = take further action.

Chapter objectives

  • Recognize figurative meaning.
  • Match idioms to register and context.
  • Avoid overusing idioms in formal prose.
IdiomMeaningExample
get to the pointState the main idea directlyThe speaker finally got to the point.
on the same pageShare an understandingThe team met to ensure agreement.
a grey areaUnclear or unregulated situationThe policy leaves a grey area.
tip of the icebergSmall visible part of a larger problemReported cases may be only the tip.
back to square oneReturn to the beginning after failureFunding loss sent the project back.
read between the linesInfer unstated meaningThe email indirectly rejects the proposal.
Register. An item may test not only meaning but suitability. Idioms can be too informal for academic writing.
Part III — Writing (20%)

Chapter objectives

  • Identify a focused controlling idea.
  • Develop it with evidence and explanation.
  • Write a closing sentence that synthesizes.

An effective topic sentence identifies the subject and limits it through a controlling idea. “Mentoring is important” is broad. “Structured mentoring improves novice teachers’ adjustment by providing timely feedback and practical knowledge” predicts a focused paragraph.

Useful development sequence: claim → evidence/example → explanation → link to controlling idea.

Topic: Regular low-stakes quizzes can improve learning when used diagnostically.
Support: They reveal misconceptions before final assessment and help teachers adjust instruction. Because marks carry little weight, errors become information rather than permanent failure.
Conclusion: Their chief value lies not in producing grades but in guiding the next stage of teaching and learning.

Chapter objectives

  • Match language and structure to purpose.
  • Recognize hybrids and dominant genre.
  • Avoid genre-specific weaknesses.
GenreEssential qualitiesCommon weakness
NarrativeTemporal control, conflict, viewpoint and causal event chainChronology without significance; tense inconsistency
DescriptiveDominant impression, selective sensory detail, spatial logicRandom adjective list
ExpositoryClarity, definition, organization and examplesUnsupported assertion or unexplained terminology
ArgumentativeDebatable claim, evidence, counterargument and reasoningRepeated opinion without evidence
Narrative: When the network failed before the presentation, one member opened an offline copy, turning a likely failure into a lesson about preparation.
Descriptive: Labelled folders lined one wall, low shelves held manipulatives, and a round table occupied the bright space beside the window.
Expository: Formative assessment is evidence collected during learning to inform the next instructional decision.
Argumentative: Schools should protect collaborative planning time because isolated preparation weakens curriculum coherence.

Chapter objectives

  • Choose a pattern that answers the purpose.
  • Use consistent criteria and logical order.
  • Recognize mixed patterns and dominant structure.
PatternPlanning frameTransitions
DefinitionCategory + distinguishing features + boundary + examplerefers to, in this context, unlike
ClassificationPrinciple + categories + examplescan be divided into, one type
SequenceStages in orderinitially, next, once, finally
Comparison–contrastBlock or point-by-point with identical criteriasimilarly, whereas, both
Problem–solutionProblem + criteria + solution + feasibilitycentral problem, one response, however
Cause–effectCause + mechanism + consequencebecause, contributes to, consequently
Causal caution. Sequence is not proof of causation. Match the verb to evidence: is associated with is weaker than causes.

Chapter objectives

  • Establish context and focus efficiently.
  • Write a precise thesis.
  • Conclude through synthesis and significance.

Introduction functions

  1. Orient the reader.
  2. Narrow scope and define terms.
  3. Establish a problem or debate.
  4. State thesis, purpose or organizing principle.
Weak: Education has always been important. There are many opinions about technology.
Improved: As schools adopt digital platforms, access is no longer the only concern; task quality is equally decisive. Technology improves learning only when it supports purposeful interaction, feedback and cognitive challenge.

Conclusion functions

  1. Reframe rather than copy the thesis.
  2. Synthesize reasoning.
  3. State significance, implication or recommendation.
  4. Avoid new major evidence.
Digital access can widen opportunity, but access alone does not guarantee learning. Investment should therefore prioritize pedagogical capacity alongside infrastructure.

Chapter objectives

  • Maintain one controlling focus.
  • Use cohesive resources accurately.
  • Build logical progression.

Unity: every sentence develops the controlling idea. A grammatically correct sentence can still be irrelevant.

Cohesion: use reference, repetition, substitution, parallelism and connectors. Replace vague “This shows…” with “This difference in completion rates shows…”

Coherence: organize logically and use old-to-new information flow: begin with familiar material and end with the new point that the next sentence develops.

Incoherent: Feedback is useful. The programme began in March. Teachers need comments. The building has two computer rooms.
Revision: Feedback is most useful when specific. Instead of “good work,” a teacher can identify the successful strategy and the next improvement. Such comments turn evaluation into guidance.

Chapter objectives

  • Punctuate clause boundaries and inserted information.
  • Maintain spelling consistency.
  • Apply capitalization accurately.

Comma

  • After an introductory dependent clause.
  • Between independent clauses joined by a coordinating conjunction.
  • Around non-restrictive information.
  • To separate series items and prevent ambiguity.

Semicolon and colon

  • Semicolon joins related independent clauses.
  • Use semicolon + conjunctive adverb + comma.
  • A colon follows a complete clause and introduces explanation, list or example.

Apostrophe

  • teacher’s notes; teachers’ notes; children’s work.
  • it’s = it is; possessive its has no apostrophe.

Capitalization and spelling

Capitalize sentence beginnings, proper nouns and official names. Do not capitalize common nouns for emphasis. Use one spelling variety consistently and proofread pairs such as affect/effect, principal/principle, their/there/they’re, complement/compliment.

Revision and sources
  • I can scan for exact details and synonyms.
  • I compare entities by the same criterion.
  • I separate fact, evaluation and prediction.
  • I resolve reference through grammar and meaning.
  • I infer vocabulary from morphology, syntax and discourse.
  • I identify cohesive resources.
  • I recognize organizational patterns.
  • I infer viewpoint, tone and intention.
  • I preserve modality in paraphrase.
  • I summarize whole texts.
  • I control articles and quantifiers.
  • I select tense and aspect.
  • I know gerund/infinitive patterns.
  • I interpret modal force.
  • I maintain pronoun clarity.
  • I know dependent prepositions.
  • I punctuate conjunctions.
  • I identify clause types.
  • I form passive constructions.
  • I report speech accurately.
  • I form mixed conditionals.
  • I select context-appropriate functions.
  • I identify word formation.
  • I separate form from function.
  • I recognize mitigation and accusation.
  • I recognize variety differences without stereotypes.
  • I distinguish semantic relations.
  • I recognize collocations.
  • I apply phrasal-verb separability.
  • I interpret idioms and register.
  • I evaluate paragraph focus.
  • I distinguish genres.
  • I evaluate openings and conclusions.
  • I diagnose cohesion/coherence.
  • I correct mechanics.
StageApproximate timeAction
Initial scan10 minutesCheck instructions, page count and section distribution.
Reading45–55 minutesLocal questions before global/inference questions.
Language120–135 minutesSecure items first; analytical and flagged items later.
Writing analysis45–55 minutesEvaluate purpose, structure, flow and mechanics.
Final review20–30 minutesCheck omissions, answer-sheet alignment, negatives and qualifiers.

Adjust to the actual test and your performance profile.

Authoritative references

The official specification determines scope. Supplementary institutional sources provide the explanatory framework. All examples, passages and practice items are original.

  1. Moroccan Ministry of National Education, Preschool and Sports — National Centre for School Examinations and Learning Assessment. English specialization test specifications, November 2025 session.
  2. Council of Europe. CEFR Companion Volume (2020) and language versions.
  3. Council of Europe. Reading comprehension.
  4. British Council LearnEnglish. English grammar reference and B1–B2 grammar.
  5. Cambridge Dictionary — English Grammar Today. Words, sentences and clauses; Collocation; Phrasal verbs and multi-word verbs.
  6. Purdue University Online Writing Lab. Paragraphs and paragraphing; Revising for cohesion; Punctuation.

This is an independent study resource, not an official examination paper or scoring commentary.