Advanced English Knowledge and Skills
A complete knowledge unit for the English specialization test (qualifying secondary cycle), built on the official November 2025 test specifications: Reading Comprehension (20%), Language (60%: grammar, communicative functions, language and cultural awareness, lexis) and Writing (20%). 31 chapters with explicit objectives, worked examples and examination traps, plus 58 practice items in three graded tests.
Objectifs du module
- Scan for explicit information and compare details accurately.
- Distinguish fact, opinion, prediction and degree of certainty.
- Resolve anaphoric and cataphoric reference.
- Infer vocabulary through grammatical, lexical and contextual cues.
- Recognize cohesion and organizational patterns.
- Identify viewpoint, tone, purpose, attitude, mood and intention.
- Paraphrase and summarize faithfully.
- Apply the complete targeted grammar system.
- Select communicative functions appropriate to context and politeness.
- Analyze word classes, word formation, phrases, clauses and sentence functions.
- Recognize discourse modes and British/American conventions without stereotyping.
- Interpret lexical meaning, collocations, phrasal verbs and idioms.
- Evaluate paragraph structure, genres and organizational patterns.
- Judge unity, cohesion, coherence and mechanics.
- Manage a weighted four-hour objective test strategically.
The official specification divides the English specialization test into Reading Comprehension, Language and Writing. The Language component is largest, but the components interact: grammar and lexis support reading, while reading provides models for writing.
| Main component | Sub-component | Official weight | Preparation priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reading Comprehension | Narrative, descriptive, argumentative, expository and other texts | 20% | Retrieval, inference, structure and reformulation |
| Language | Grammar | 25% | Accuracy and form–meaning relations |
| Language | Communicative functions | 5% | Contextually appropriate speech acts |
| Language | Language and cultural awareness | 15% | Metalanguage, structure, register and variation |
| Language | Lexis | 15% | Meaning relations and lexical patterning |
| Writing | Paragraphs, genres, organization, cohesion and mechanics | 20% | Recognizing and diagnosing effective prose |
How to work with this unit
Understand
Learn the form–meaning relationship, not just the label.
Discriminate
Compare near-correct alternatives and identify the decisive feature.
Retrieve
Answer without notes and explain why distractors fail.
Chapter objectives
- Differentiate narrative, descriptive, argumentative and expository texts.
- Predict likely structures and language features before close reading.
- Use a three-pass procedure under examination conditions.
A genre is not merely a label. It creates expectations about purpose, organization, evidence and language. A text may combine genres, but one communicative purpose is usually dominant.
| Genre | Primary purpose | Typical organization | Frequent signals |
|---|---|---|---|
| Narrative | Relate events and their significance | Orientation → complication → development → resolution/reflection | Past tenses, temporal markers, viewpoint, dialogue and action verbs |
| Descriptive | Create a precise impression | Spatial order, general-to-specific or dominant impression | Adjectives, sensory language, location expressions and comparison |
| Argumentative | Defend a claim and influence judgment | Position → reasons/evidence → counterargument → response → conclusion | Evaluation, modals, concession, causal links and evidence verbs |
| Expository | Explain, classify or inform | Definition, classification, sequence, cause–effect, comparison or problem–solution | Technical terms, examples, definitions and logical connectors |
The three-pass procedure
- Preview: inspect title, source, opening and paragraph beginnings. Form a provisional hypothesis.
- Question-led reading: identify whether the item requires a detail, relation, attitude, reference or whole-text judgment.
- Verification: return to the relevant lines and test every option. Choose what is fully supported, not merely plausible.
“The report defines microlearning, divides it into three formats and gives an example of each.” The organization is definition followed by classification and exemplification.
Chapter objectives
- Locate specific information without rereading the entire text.
- Compare entities using the same criterion.
- Distinguish verifiable claims from evaluations, predictions and recommendations.
Scanning
Convert the question into a search key: a date, name, percentage, repeated term, synonym or category. Read a small window around the match because the answer may be expressed indirectly.
Comparison
Compare like with like: cost with cost, purpose with purpose, method with method. A distractor may combine one true statement about A with an unrelated truth about B.
| Criterion | Programme A | Programme B | Relationship |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delivery | Weekly seminar | Self-paced modules | Difference |
| Assessment | Portfolio | Portfolio | Similarity |
| Target group | New teachers | Experienced mentors | Difference |
Fact versus opinion
| Statement | Classification | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| The survey included 840 participants. | Fact | Numerically verifiable. |
| The redesigned course is far more engaging. | Opinion | Evaluative comparison. |
| The policy will probably reduce absence. | Prediction/opinion | Future outcome marked as probability. |
| The committee recommends a two-year trial. | Reportable fact about a recommendation | Its existence can be verified; its wisdom remains evaluative. |
Chapter objectives
- Resolve anaphora and cataphora through agreement, meaning and discourse focus.
- Infer unfamiliar vocabulary from morphology, syntax and context.
- Recognize reference, substitution, ellipsis, conjunction and lexical cohesion.
Reference
Anaphora points backward: “The teachers revised the plan. They simplified it.” Cataphora points forward: “When she entered, Dr Patel noticed the silence.” Use agreement, semantic compatibility, grammatical role and discourse prominence.
Vocabulary inference
| Cue | Question | Illustration |
|---|---|---|
| Morphology | What do prefix, root and suffix suggest? | misinterpretation = wrong understanding. |
| Syntax | What part of speech fits? | “a remarkably lucid explanation” → adjective. |
| Definition/apposition | Does the text restate it? | “formative assessment, ongoing feedback used to improve learning.” |
| Contrast | Is it opposed to a known idea? | “not rigid but adaptable” → flexible. |
| Example | Do examples reveal the category? | “renewable sources such as solar and wind.” |
| Cause/result | What effect does it produce? | “The instructions were ambiguous, so groups interpreted them differently.” |
Cohesive patterns
| Resource | Function | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Reference | Points to people or ideas | this finding, they, the former |
| Substitution | Replaces repeated material | “the blue folder, not the red one” |
| Ellipsis | Omits recoverable material | “Some agreed; others did not [agree].” |
| Conjunction | Signals a logical relationship | however, therefore, meanwhile |
| Lexical cohesion | Links through semantic relations | teacher → instructor → educator |
Cohesion is the surface network of links; coherence is the meaningful whole. Connectors cannot repair contradictory or badly ordered ideas.
Chapter objectives
- Identify the dominant relation among ideas.
- Distinguish topic from structure.
- Use signal words as evidence without relying on them mechanically.
| Pattern | Central question | Signals | Outline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | What is it? | refers to, means | Term → category → features → example |
| Classification | What types exist? | types, categories, divided into | Principle → categories → examples |
| Sequence | In what order? | first, next, finally | Stage 1 → Stage 2 → Stage 3 |
| Cause–effect | Why, and with what result? | because, leads to, consequently | Cause → mechanism → effect |
| Comparison–contrast | How alike or different? | similarly, whereas, unlike | Block or point-by-point |
| Problem–solution | What is wrong and what can be done? | challenge, remedy, proposal | Problem → criteria → solution → evaluation |
| Argument | What position is defended? | should, evidence, although | Claim → support → counterclaim → rebuttal |
Chapter objectives
- Separate perspective from subject matter.
- Infer tone from clusters of lexical, syntactic and rhetorical evidence.
- Distinguish attitude, mood and intention.
- Predict continuation from unresolved discourse functions.
Point of view
Literary point of view asks who perceives and narrates: first person, third-person limited or omniscient. In articles and emails, viewpoint also concerns how an issue is framed.
| Evidence | Inference |
|---|---|
| “I could not see what the others were planning.” | First-person limited knowledge. |
| Private thoughts of several characters are revealed. | Third-person omniscient. |
| An article foregrounds taxpayer cost but omits learner outcomes. | Economic or fiscal framing. |
Tone and attitude
Approving
constructive, promising, carefully designed
Critical
short-sighted, flawed, troubling
Cautious
may, appears, preliminary, to some extent
Ironic
Literal praise conflicts with context: “A brilliant plan—if the aim was confusion.”
Purpose, attitude, mood and intention
- Purpose: the response sought—inform, explain, persuade, complain, request, warn or entertain.
- Attitude: the writer’s evaluation.
- Mood: the emotional atmosphere—tense, hopeful, bleak.
- Intention: what a speaker attempts through an utterance.
Predicting continuation
A paragraph ending with a problem often moves to causes or solutions. A concession usually prepares a limitation. A narrative complication predicts attempted resolution.
Chapter objectives
- Preserve meaning while changing wording and structure.
- Reject distortion, copying and unsupported additions.
- Select main ideas and omit minor detail.
A paraphrase remains approximately as specific as the source but changes linguistic form. Preserve participants, time, modality, scope and degree.
| Source/candidate | Evaluation |
|---|---|
| Source: “Limited feedback may reduce novice teachers’ confidence.” | Key constraints: limited, may, reduce, novice. |
| “Beginning teachers can become less confident when feedback is insufficient.” | Faithful paraphrase. |
| “A lack of feedback always destroys teachers’ confidence.” | Distorted: may became always; reduce became destroy. |
| “Limited feedback may lower novice teachers’ confidence.” | Too close for an extended paraphrase. |
Paraphrase operations
- Change clause structure: active/passive, verbal/nominal, coordination/subordination.
- Change word class: the committee decided → the committee’s decision.
- Use accurate synonyms and change order.
- Preserve technical terms when substitution reduces precision.
- Keep hedges: might is not will; some is not all.
Summary hierarchy
Retain the controlling idea, major support and essential conclusion. Remove examples, repetition and decorative detail unless central.
Chapter objectives
- Choose articles through definiteness, countability and reference.
- Distinguish determiners from quantifiers.
- Apply quantity expressions accurately.
| Form | Core meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| a/an | One non-specific singular count noun; first mention; classification | “She proposed a solution.” |
| the | Identifiable/unique reference; shared knowledge; second mention | “I read a report. The report was detailed.” |
| Zero article | General plural/non-count reference | “Feedback supports learning.” |
Simplified order: predeterminer + central determiner + number/order + adjective + noun: all those first three demanding tasks. Two central determiners normally cannot co-occur: the my book → my book.
| Count plural | Non-count | Both | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| many, few, a few, fewer | much, little, a little, less | some, any, enough, a lot of | few/little ≈ almost none; a few/a little = some |
| each, every + singular | — | all | each highlights individuals; every covers all members |
Chapter objectives
- Interpret tense and aspect.
- Maintain logical tense relationships.
- Select gerund or infinitive complements by pattern and meaning.
| Form | Typical use | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Present simple | States, routines, truths, schedules | “The course begins on Monday.” |
| Present continuous | Temporary activity, arrangement, change | “The team is revising the rubric.” |
| Past simple | Completed event in finished past time | “They published it in 2024.” |
| Past continuous | Background/in-progress past activity | “While they were working, the system failed.” |
| Present perfect | Past connected to present; unfinished period | “Researchers have identified three patterns.” |
| Past perfect | Earlier past relative to a later past point | “The meeting began after everyone had arrived.” |
| Future perfect | Completion before a future point | “By June, they will have completed three cycles.” |
Some stative verbs resist progressive aspect: know, believe, belong. Meaning can change: “I think it is fair” (opinion) versus “I am thinking about it” (activity).
| Pattern | Examples | Illustration |
|---|---|---|
| verb + -ing | avoid, consider, enjoy, suggest | “They suggested revising the schedule.” |
| verb + to-infinitive | agree, decide, hope, refuse | “They agreed to revise it.” |
| verb + object + to-infinitive | advise, allow, encourage, tell | “The mentor encouraged her to apply.” |
| preposition + -ing | before, without, interested in | “Before submitting, check the file.” |
- remember to do = remember a required action; remember doing = recall.
- stop to do = pause in order to; stop doing = discontinue.
- try to do = attempt; try doing = experiment.
Chapter objectives
- Express ability, permission, obligation, advice, possibility and deduction.
- Interpret force and politeness.
- Form modal perfects.
| Function | Forms | Key contrast |
|---|---|---|
| Ability | can, could, be able to | could general past ability; managed to one successful event |
| Permission | can, may, could | Tentativeness and formality vary by context |
| Obligation | must, have to, need to | mustn’t = prohibition; don’t have to = no necessity |
| Advice | should, ought to, had better | had better often implies consequences |
| Possibility | may, might, could | Degree depends on context |
| Deduction | must, can’t, may/might | “She must be busy” is inference, not obligation |
Modal perfect pattern: modal + have + past participle.
- must have forgotten: strong past deduction.
- might have missed: possible past event.
- should have checked: criticism/regret.
- needn’t have printed: it happened but was unnecessary.
- could have applied: unrealized possibility.
Chapter objectives
- Control countability, number and possession.
- Maintain clear reference and agreement.
- Distinguish major pronoun classes.
- Count: a criterion/two criteria; an analysis/several analyses.
- Non-count: evidence, feedback, progress, knowledge.
- Collective: team, committee, staff; agreement may reflect unit or members and varies by variety.
- Compound: the head is usually final: two classroom observation reports.
The teacher looked worried when the supervisor spoke to her. The revision removes ambiguous reference.
Use a reflexive when subject and object are the same: “She assessed herself.” Use it emphatically: “The director herself answered.” Do not use it as a formal substitute for me: contact Ahmed or myself → contact Ahmed or me.
Chapter objectives
- Choose prepositions of time, place, movement and abstract relation.
- Learn dependent prepositions as lexical patterns.
- Distinguish prepositions from particles.
| Domain | Contrast | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Time | at point; on day/date; in period | at 9; on Tuesday; in August |
| Place | at point/institution; on surface; in enclosure | at school; on the desk; in the room |
| Movement | to, into, onto, through, across | “walked into the office and across the room” |
| Duration | for length; since starting point | for two years; since 2024 |
Learn dependent patterns as units: responsible for, interested in, capable of, comply with, depend on, contribute to, distinguish between, object to. A preposition takes a noun phrase or gerund: “object to changing the procedure.”
Chapter objectives
- Coordinate equal units.
- Subordinate clauses for logical relations.
- Use correlative structures in parallel form.
| Type | Forms | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Coordinating | and, but, or, nor, for, so, yet | “Simple, yet powerful.” |
| Subordinating | because, although, if, unless, while | “Although it is simple, it needs practice.” |
| Correlative | both…and; either…or; not only…but also | “Both accuracy and fluency.” |
| Conjunctive adverb | however, therefore, moreover | “The sample was small; therefore, the conclusion was cautious.” |
Maintain parallelism: “both identifying errors and explaining corrections”, not “both identifying errors and an explanation of corrections.”
- Independent clause + comma + coordinating conjunction + independent clause.
- Independent clause + semicolon + conjunctive adverb + comma + independent clause.
- Introductory dependent clause + comma + independent clause.
Chapter objectives
- Distinguish phrases, finite clauses and non-finite clauses.
- Identify noun, relative and adverbial clauses.
- Diagnose fragments and run-ons.
- A phrase has a head but no full subject–finite verb relation: the carefully revised policy.
- A finite clause contains tense/modality: the committee revised the policy.
- A non-finite clause uses infinitive/participle: to improve access; having reviewed the data.
| Clause | Function | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Noun clause | Subject, object or complement | “What the team discovered changed the plan.” |
| Relative/adjective clause | Modifies a noun | “The plan that the team proposed.” |
| Adverbial clause | Time, reason, condition, concession, etc. | “They revised it because the evidence changed.” |
Simple: one independent clause. Compound: two or more independent clauses. Complex: independent + dependent. Compound-complex: at least two independent + dependent.
Restrictive relative clauses identify the noun and usually have no commas. Non-restrictive clauses add supplementary information and use commas; standard usage does not use that in them.
Chapter objectives
- Form passive constructions across tenses and modals.
- Choose passive according to focus.
- Recognize reporting and causative patterns.
Pattern: subject + BE in the required form + past participle (+ by-agent).
| Active | Passive | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| The panel evaluates applications. | Applications are evaluated by the panel. | Process/applications |
| They have revised the criteria. | The criteria have been revised. | Result; agent unimportant |
| Schools must submit the form. | The form must be submitted by schools. | Required item |
- Unknown agent: “The window was broken.”
- Obvious/irrelevant agent: “Results will be announced.”
- Topical process: “Each application is scored twice.”
- Impersonal reporting: “It is believed that…” / “The reform is believed to…”
Have/get something done means arrange for someone else to act: “The school had the network repaired.” Get + participle is often less formal and event-focused.
Chapter objectives
- Report statements, questions, commands and requests.
- Apply backshift where context requires.
- Choose reporting-verb patterns.
Backshift is common after a past reporting verb: present → past; present perfect/past → past perfect; will → would; can → could. It may be unnecessary for still-valid facts or immediate reporting.
- Reported questions use statement order: “He asked where the meeting was.”
- Yes/no questions use if/whether.
- Commands/requests: tell/ask/order/warn + object + (not) to-infinitive.
| Pattern | Verbs | Example |
|---|---|---|
| verb + that-clause | admit, claim, explain, insist | “She explained that the deadline had changed.” |
| verb + to-infinitive | agree, offer, promise, refuse | “He offered to help.” |
| verb + object + to-infinitive | advise, remind, tell, warn | “They reminded us to sign.” |
| verb + -ing | admit, deny, recommend, suggest | “She denied changing it.” |
| verb + preposition + -ing | apologize for, insist on, object to | “He apologized for arriving late.” |
Chapter objectives
- Distinguish real, hypothetical and counterfactual conditions.
- Form mixed conditionals by time relationship.
- Use wish and if only accurately.
| Type | Form | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zero | if + present, present | General relation | If water reaches 100°C at sea level, it boils. |
| First | if + present, will/modal + base | Real future possibility | If the file arrives, we will review it. |
| Second | if + past, would + base | Hypothetical present/future | If I were responsible, I would revise it. |
| Third | if + past perfect, would have + participle | Counterfactual past | If they had tested it, they would have found the error. |
| Mixed | Past condition + present result, or reverse | Times differ | If she had accepted, she would be abroad now. |
Alternatives: unless = if not; provided that, as long as; inversion: “Had they known, they would have acted.” In case expresses precaution, not the same condition as if.
- wish + past: unsatisfactory present.
- wish + past perfect: past regret.
- wish + would: desired change, often irritation.
- wish + could: desired ability/possibility.
Chapter objectives
- Recognize speech acts in context.
- Select expressions appropriate to relationship and setting.
- Distinguish grammatical form from pragmatic function.
| Function | Neutral | Tentative/formal |
|---|---|---|
| Agreeing | I agree. | That is persuasive, particularly because… |
| Partial agreement | That is partly true, but… | I accept the principle; however, its application may be problematic. |
| Complaining | The order arrived late. | I am writing to express concern about the delayed delivery. |
| Certainty | I am certain that… | The available evidence strongly indicates that… |
| Apologizing | I am sorry for the delay. | Please accept my apologies for the inconvenience. |
| Requesting | Please send the file. | Could you please send the revised file by Thursday? |
| Suggesting | Let’s revise it. | It may be worth considering a revision. |
| Refusing | I cannot attend. | I am afraid I will not be able to attend. |
Form and function may differ. “Can you open the window?” is grammatically a question about ability but pragmatically a request. “You might want to check the total” is tactful advice or warning.
Chapter objectives
- Classify words by syntactic behavior.
- Identify derivation, inflection, compounding and conversion.
- Use affixes to infer meaning and class.
| Class | Typical role | Diagnostic evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Noun | Head of noun phrase | May pluralize, take a determiner or possessive. |
| Verb | Head of verb phrase | May show tense and combine with auxiliaries. |
| Adjective | Modifier or complement | May precede noun or follow linking verb. |
| Adverb | Modifier of verb/adjective/adverb/clause | Flexible position; many, not all, end in -ly. |
| Determiner | Marks noun-phrase reference | the, this, my, some, each. |
| Preposition | Heads prepositional phrase | Takes noun phrase or gerund complement. |
- Derivation: educate → education → educational.
- Inflection: teach → teaches/taught/teaching.
- Compounding: classroom, feedback cycle, data-driven.
- Conversion: email noun → verb without an affix.
- Clipping/blending/acronymy: lab, webinar, UNESCO.
| Affix | Meaning/class | Example |
|---|---|---|
| un-, in-/im-, dis- | negative/opposite | unclear, impractical, disagree |
| re-, mis-, over-, under- | again, wrongly, excessive, insufficient | reassess, misread, overgeneralize |
| -tion, -ment, -ity | noun-forming | evaluation, development, validity |
| -ive, -al, -ous, -able | adjective-forming | formative, cultural, rigorous |
Chapter objectives
- Identify heads, modifiers and complements.
- Distinguish form from function.
- Analyze subject, verb, object, complement and adjunct.
In “the extremely useful diagnostic report,” report is the noun head; the is determiner; extremely useful is an adjective phrase modifier.
| Expression | Form | Function |
|---|---|---|
| After the meeting, we left. | Prepositional phrase | Adjunct of time |
| The aim is to improve access. | Infinitival clause | Subject complement |
| We discussed what the survey revealed. | Finite noun clause | Direct object |
| The candidates seemed confident. | Adjective phrase | Subject complement |
Common clause patterns: SV, SVC, SVO, SVOO, SVOC.
- SV: Attendance increased.
- SVC: The result seems reliable.
- SVO: The panel reviewed the evidence.
- SVOO: The mentor gave the trainee feedback.
- SVOC: The panel considered the evidence insufficient.
Chapter objectives
- Identify discourse mode.
- Recognize mitigation and intensification.
- Evaluate register and interpersonal effect.
| Mode | Purpose | Typical realizations |
|---|---|---|
| Assertion | Present a proposition as true | Declaratives, evidential verbs, certainty markers |
| Denial | Reject truth or responsibility | not, deny, no evidence, did not |
| Objection | Challenge a proposal or claim | I object to…, however…, that overlooks… |
| Accusation | Attribute wrongdoing | You failed to…, they deliberately… |
| Politeness | Manage distance and imposition | Indirectness, hedges, apologies, gratitude, conditionals |
Mitigation: perhaps, somewhat, may, appears, I am afraid, could you. Intensification: clearly, absolutely, entirely, must, deeply.
Mitigated objection: “The procedure does not appear to have been followed in this instance.” The second depersonalizes criticism while retaining the problem.
Chapter objectives
- Recognize common systematic differences without ranking varieties.
- Interpret vocabulary and conventions contextually.
- Avoid stereotypes and overgeneralization.
| British tendency | American tendency | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| -our | -or | colour/color; behaviour/behavior |
| -re | -er | centre/center; metre/meter |
| -ise/-ize both possible | -ize common | organise/organize |
| Often doubles final l | Often single l | travelling/traveling |
| British | American | Referent |
|---|---|---|
| flat | apartment | Residence in a larger building |
| lift | elevator | Vertical transport |
| holiday | vacation | Period away from work/school |
| queue | line | People waiting |
| head teacher | principal | School leader; systems vary |
- British usage more readily uses plural agreement with collective nouns when emphasizing members; American usage more often uses singular.
- Have got is especially common in British informal possession.
- Recent-event present-perfect versus past-simple preferences can differ.
Chapter objectives
- Interpret meaning in context.
- Distinguish near-synonyms by connotation, register and collocation.
- Recognize major semantic relations.
| Relation | Definition | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Synonymy | Similarity, rarely complete identity | begin/start |
| Antonymy | Opposition | gradable hot/cold; converse buy/sell |
| Hyponymy | Kind-of relation | oak is a kind of tree |
| Meronymy | Part–whole | chapter is part of a book |
| Polysemy | Related senses | head of a person/department/table |
| Homonymy | Same form, unrelated meanings | river bank/financial bank |
Near-synonyms differ in denotation, connotation, register, grammar and collocation. Slim and skinny both imply thinness, but often have different evaluations. Ask and inquire/enquire differ in formality.
Chapter objectives
- Recognize conventional word partnerships.
- Distinguish grammatical possibility from idiomatic choice.
- Record vocabulary in chunks.
| Pattern | Examples |
|---|---|
| Adjective + noun | strong evidence, heavy workload, close attention |
| Verb + noun | draw a conclusion, meet a deadline, conduct research |
| Noun + noun | assessment criteria, learning outcome, policy framework |
| Adverb + adjective | highly effective, deeply concerned |
| Verb + adverb | strongly recommend, vary considerably |
| Prepositional pattern | increase in, reason for, access to |
do a decision · make research · do responsibility · put a question
Chapter objectives
- Distinguish phrasal, prepositional and phrasal-prepositional verbs.
- Apply separability rules.
- Infer literal and idiomatic meanings.
| Type | Structure | Example | Object position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phrasal | verb + particle | turn down an offer | Often separable; pronoun: turn it down |
| Prepositional | verb + preposition | rely on evidence | Not separable: rely on it |
| Phrasal-prepositional | verb + particle + preposition | put up with noise | Object follows full unit |
- carry out = perform.
- point out = draw attention to.
- look into = investigate.
- come up with = produce an idea.
- rule out = eliminate as a possibility.
- follow up on = take further action.
Chapter objectives
- Recognize figurative meaning.
- Match idioms to register and context.
- Avoid overusing idioms in formal prose.
| Idiom | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| get to the point | State the main idea directly | The speaker finally got to the point. |
| on the same page | Share an understanding | The team met to ensure agreement. |
| a grey area | Unclear or unregulated situation | The policy leaves a grey area. |
| tip of the iceberg | Small visible part of a larger problem | Reported cases may be only the tip. |
| back to square one | Return to the beginning after failure | Funding loss sent the project back. |
| read between the lines | Infer unstated meaning | The email indirectly rejects the proposal. |
Chapter objectives
- Identify a focused controlling idea.
- Develop it with evidence and explanation.
- Write a closing sentence that synthesizes.
An effective topic sentence identifies the subject and limits it through a controlling idea. “Mentoring is important” is broad. “Structured mentoring improves novice teachers’ adjustment by providing timely feedback and practical knowledge” predicts a focused paragraph.
Useful development sequence: claim → evidence/example → explanation → link to controlling idea.
Support: They reveal misconceptions before final assessment and help teachers adjust instruction. Because marks carry little weight, errors become information rather than permanent failure.
Conclusion: Their chief value lies not in producing grades but in guiding the next stage of teaching and learning.
Chapter objectives
- Match language and structure to purpose.
- Recognize hybrids and dominant genre.
- Avoid genre-specific weaknesses.
| Genre | Essential qualities | Common weakness |
|---|---|---|
| Narrative | Temporal control, conflict, viewpoint and causal event chain | Chronology without significance; tense inconsistency |
| Descriptive | Dominant impression, selective sensory detail, spatial logic | Random adjective list |
| Expository | Clarity, definition, organization and examples | Unsupported assertion or unexplained terminology |
| Argumentative | Debatable claim, evidence, counterargument and reasoning | Repeated opinion without evidence |
Narrative: When the network failed before the presentation, one member opened an offline copy, turning a likely failure into a lesson about preparation.
Descriptive: Labelled folders lined one wall, low shelves held manipulatives, and a round table occupied the bright space beside the window.
Expository: Formative assessment is evidence collected during learning to inform the next instructional decision.
Argumentative: Schools should protect collaborative planning time because isolated preparation weakens curriculum coherence.
Chapter objectives
- Choose a pattern that answers the purpose.
- Use consistent criteria and logical order.
- Recognize mixed patterns and dominant structure.
| Pattern | Planning frame | Transitions |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Category + distinguishing features + boundary + example | refers to, in this context, unlike |
| Classification | Principle + categories + examples | can be divided into, one type |
| Sequence | Stages in order | initially, next, once, finally |
| Comparison–contrast | Block or point-by-point with identical criteria | similarly, whereas, both |
| Problem–solution | Problem + criteria + solution + feasibility | central problem, one response, however |
| Cause–effect | Cause + mechanism + consequence | because, contributes to, consequently |
Chapter objectives
- Establish context and focus efficiently.
- Write a precise thesis.
- Conclude through synthesis and significance.
Introduction functions
- Orient the reader.
- Narrow scope and define terms.
- Establish a problem or debate.
- State thesis, purpose or organizing principle.
Improved: As schools adopt digital platforms, access is no longer the only concern; task quality is equally decisive. Technology improves learning only when it supports purposeful interaction, feedback and cognitive challenge.
Conclusion functions
- Reframe rather than copy the thesis.
- Synthesize reasoning.
- State significance, implication or recommendation.
- Avoid new major evidence.
Chapter objectives
- Maintain one controlling focus.
- Use cohesive resources accurately.
- Build logical progression.
Unity: every sentence develops the controlling idea. A grammatically correct sentence can still be irrelevant.
Cohesion: use reference, repetition, substitution, parallelism and connectors. Replace vague “This shows…” with “This difference in completion rates shows…”
Coherence: organize logically and use old-to-new information flow: begin with familiar material and end with the new point that the next sentence develops.
Revision: Feedback is most useful when specific. Instead of “good work,” a teacher can identify the successful strategy and the next improvement. Such comments turn evaluation into guidance.
Chapter objectives
- Punctuate clause boundaries and inserted information.
- Maintain spelling consistency.
- Apply capitalization accurately.
Comma
- After an introductory dependent clause.
- Between independent clauses joined by a coordinating conjunction.
- Around non-restrictive information.
- To separate series items and prevent ambiguity.
Semicolon and colon
- Semicolon joins related independent clauses.
- Use semicolon + conjunctive adverb + comma.
- A colon follows a complete clause and introduces explanation, list or example.
Apostrophe
- teacher’s notes; teachers’ notes; children’s work.
- it’s = it is; possessive its has no apostrophe.
Capitalization and spelling
Capitalize sentence beginnings, proper nouns and official names. Do not capitalize common nouns for emphasis. Use one spelling variety consistently and proofread pairs such as affect/effect, principal/principle, their/there/they’re, complement/compliment.
- I can scan for exact details and synonyms.
- I compare entities by the same criterion.
- I separate fact, evaluation and prediction.
- I resolve reference through grammar and meaning.
- I infer vocabulary from morphology, syntax and discourse.
- I identify cohesive resources.
- I recognize organizational patterns.
- I infer viewpoint, tone and intention.
- I preserve modality in paraphrase.
- I summarize whole texts.
- I control articles and quantifiers.
- I select tense and aspect.
- I know gerund/infinitive patterns.
- I interpret modal force.
- I maintain pronoun clarity.
- I know dependent prepositions.
- I punctuate conjunctions.
- I identify clause types.
- I form passive constructions.
- I report speech accurately.
- I form mixed conditionals.
- I select context-appropriate functions.
- I identify word formation.
- I separate form from function.
- I recognize mitigation and accusation.
- I recognize variety differences without stereotypes.
- I distinguish semantic relations.
- I recognize collocations.
- I apply phrasal-verb separability.
- I interpret idioms and register.
- I evaluate paragraph focus.
- I distinguish genres.
- I evaluate openings and conclusions.
- I diagnose cohesion/coherence.
- I correct mechanics.
| Stage | Approximate time | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Initial scan | 10 minutes | Check instructions, page count and section distribution. |
| Reading | 45–55 minutes | Local questions before global/inference questions. |
| Language | 120–135 minutes | Secure items first; analytical and flagged items later. |
| Writing analysis | 45–55 minutes | Evaluate purpose, structure, flow and mechanics. |
| Final review | 20–30 minutes | Check omissions, answer-sheet alignment, negatives and qualifiers. |
Adjust to the actual test and your performance profile.
Authoritative references
The official specification determines scope. Supplementary institutional sources provide the explanatory framework. All examples, passages and practice items are original.
- Moroccan Ministry of National Education, Preschool and Sports — National Centre for School Examinations and Learning Assessment. English specialization test specifications, November 2025 session.
- Council of Europe. CEFR Companion Volume (2020) and language versions.
- Council of Europe. Reading comprehension.
- British Council LearnEnglish. English grammar reference and B1–B2 grammar.
- Cambridge Dictionary — English Grammar Today. Words, sentences and clauses; Collocation; Phrasal verbs and multi-word verbs.
- Purdue University Online Writing Lab. Paragraphs and paragraphing; Revising for cohesion; Punctuation.
This is an independent study resource, not an official examination paper or scoring commentary.